Seatbelts Laws Are Beneficial- Disagree Essay Example

Seatbelts Laws Are Beneficial Seatbelts Laws Are Beneficial- Disagree Essay Seatbelts Laws Are Beneficial- Disagree Essay The article that is being review is called Primary Seat belt Enforcement Laws Are Beneficial. The writer of this article is Kathyrn O’Leary Higgins. She explains on the logical thinking behind why seatbelt Torahs are really good to have on. Her chief logical thinking of this article is to explicate and commend you for sing this step that will so easy salvage many motor vehicle residents from crash-related deceases and hurts. She strongly believes that people who do non have on at that place seatbelt are more likely to acquire in to auto accidents. She did a great occupation seting this article together with all the good information and great points to each thought. The writer Kathyrn does give good credibleness throughout her article. Her vocabulary was good aimed toward college pupils. She did non nevertheless look in the way on how seatbelt Torahs can be unbeneficial. Although her subject is really problematic many do non hold with the thought that seatbelt enforcement Tora hs are good. Seatbelt Torahs may be the figure one defence against motor vehicle hurts and fatalities . The writer besides mentions that. These drivers. who choose non to clasp up. be given to exhibit multiple high hazard behaviours and are more often involved in clangs. Yet. that thought can be really problematic. Many people would extremely differ. merely because you aren’t have oning your seat belt doesn’t many you are more likely to drive loony. In add-on. Many people believe that it should be your ain determination if you want to have on a seat belt or non. Yes there may be many instances where a seat belt has saved persons lives. But there are besides many accidents where a seat belt has killed a person’s life or earnestly injured the person. For an illustration on how a seat belt killed an person. there was one accident wear the auto caught on fire and the person could non acquire the seat belt unattached which kept him trapped in the auto and died from the fire. Besides many people get injured from seat belts. They get bad thorax and shoulder hurts. There was one paper that mentioned on how the female parent left her girl in the auto while she was holding a conversation with a friend. She had a bad feeling and deceided to halt and look into on her girl. She knew something was non right when seen that her girl wasn’t traveling about. She opened the door to see her girl with two seat belts wrapped around her cervix. She was strangulating at that place and as they tried to un wrap the seat belts they got tighter. until they eventually got something to cut the seat belts and acquire her loose. That’s another great illustration on how seatbelts aren’t ever at that place for merely safety. Some people even believe that they can drive faster if have oning their seat belt. they believe if they crash they are safe due to the seat belt. which is pathetic. If this merely sounds perfectly absurd. inquire yourself: would you drive with greater attention if – one all right day- you woke and discovered that person c ut off your seat belt? If the reply is yes. so it means you aren’t driving every bit safely as you can. right now with your seat belt on ( Kumar. Navin. 1 ) . Yes in many instances seat belts cut down the sum of accidents that happen. and they decrease the figure of deceases. But they cause people to drive faster and more recklessly. doing more accidents and increasing the figure of people who die. Seatbelt Torahs are besides hypocritical. The writer references. Although oppositions to primary enforcement place belt Torahs claim that nonuse is a personal pick and affects merely the person. the fact is that motor vehicle hurts and human deaths have a important social cost. Why is it that a individual in a vehicle has to have on a seat belt yet a motorcyclist doesn’t have to have on a helmet? The good jurisprudence is a misdemeanor of a person’s freedom. Seat belts are at that place if a individual chooses to have on one. and those who want to can have on their seat belt. but those who don’t want to shouldn’t be forced to have on one. If some people think others are put on the lining their life because they aren’t have oning their seat belt so that’s their sentiment. Our belief is that it’s up to you to do your ain determinations. The authorities shouldn’t be coercing anyone to make anything for their ain good. In a free society. if person is injured or killed because they freely choose to utilize or non utilize their seat belt. that is a person’s calamity. as it is with other freely chosen hazards in life. It’s non at all sensible. Citations Higgins. Kathyrn O’Leary. Primary Seat Belt Enforcement Laws Are Beneficial. Cars in America. Ed. Andrea C. Nakaya. Detroit: Greenhaven Press. 2006. Opposing Point of views. Rpt. from Testimony of Honorable Kathryn O’Leary Higgins. Board Member. National Transportation Safety Board. 2009. Gale Opposing Point of views In Context. Web. 4 Feb. 2013. hypertext transfer protocol: //ic. galegroup. com. gary. libproxy. ivytech. edu. allstate. libproxy. ivytech. edu/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow? failOverType= A ; query= A ; prodId=OVIC A ; windowstate=normal A ; contentModules= A ; mode=view A ; displayGroupName=Viewpoints A ; limiter= A ; currPage= A ; disableHighlighting=true A ; displayGroups= A ; sortBy= A ; source= A ; search_within_results= A ; action=e A ; catId= A ; activityType= A ; scanId= A ; documentId=GALE % 7CEJ3010429245 Kumar. Navin. Can safety ordinances kill you? How safe are seat belts and seatbelt Torahs? Digital Bits Skeptic. Copyright. 2012. Web 4 Feb 2013. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. dbskeptic. com/2009/06/21/can-safety-regulations-kill-you-how-safe-are-seabelts-and-seatbelt-laws/ hypertext transfer protocol: //www. sallycphotography. com/archives/2005